Amy Waldman’s novel, The Submission, focuses on a horrific
terrorist attack similar to 9/11 that spurs people into action to remember the
dead, yet fails to cause them to appreciate those still alive. In the book, parents
devote their time and attention to memorials, politics, and their career
ambitions but forget to appreciate their kids. They focus so much time and
effort on a memorial and divide themselves and their country, all, ironically,
in an attempt to unite and heal their country. Characters, like Paul, become
easily frustrated with their children and yet spend each day with people they
despise, arguing about a garden. Paul devotes months, even years to a single
memorial but when forced to attend a dinner party for his son his wife must
force him to go. An attack like the one Waldman describes should cause people
to become grateful for the people still in their lives. One woman in
particular, the mother of Sean, caused me to feel both pity and anger due to
her obvious grief but selfishness. She continually criticized her living son,
Sean, and longed for their dead one who perished in the attack. She unloads her
misery on Sean and creates unreal expectations for him, such as stopping the
building of a memorial, as if hoping he fails. He struggles with “filling the
too-big shoes of his dead brother” and through creating pathos, Waldman targets
critical parents to instill feelings of guilt (99). While the parents all try
to make grand gestures to the dead, they forget that small acts to the living
can mean even more.
From your entries, I can see that this book challenged your thinking about how you prioritize issues in your life. Furthermore, I like how you grapple with the characters' decisions and outcomes. Remember to provide enough textual proof for all of your entries, though, in order to bolster your opinions.
ReplyDelete