For me, the
color red represents Toni Morrison’s book, Song of Solomon, as I
associate the color with love and violence, two opposite extremes that Morrison
intertwines in her novel. Throughout the novel, many of the characters live
surrounded by violence due to love or a lack of love. As characters fall in
love, sorrow and death seem to quickly follow and few characters find their
happily-ever-after. Hagar, a girl obsessed with Milkman, attempts to kill him
so no one else can have him. Milkman complains that she “wants me chained to
her bed or dead” and views her as a nuisance, failing to understand the depth
of her love for him (222). Hagar later dies alone after a nervous breakdown
over her unrequited love. Hagar seeks love but uses forcefulness when she fails,
while Guitar uses love as an excuse for his cruel nature. He claims love motivate
him in order to justify his violence against whites and states that he loves
black so much that he will risk his life to kill whites in order to protect
blacks (223). Milkman and Guitar soon become enemies as Guitar’s distrust of
his friend grows until he vows to kill Milkman for supposedly betraying him. Their
once brotherly love causes them to divulge secrets in each other that lead to
jealously and suspicions as ambition overcomes their friendship. The novel ends
with them fighting and the implication that one of their lives will end with “one
of them...killing his brother” (337). Through a novel filled with such despair,
Morrison demonstrates why people must look beyond temporary emotions to see reason
so that they do not act irrationally and live to regret it.
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Too Selfish for Friendship
Song of
Solomon, a 1977 novel by
Toni Morrison, focuses on the life of Milkman, a boy caught in the middle of racial
and familial tensions who focuses solely on himself, thus preventing me from
ever wanting to befriend him. I believe hard times determine the strength of a
friendship and while Milkman’s relationships flourish during good times, as
soon as he might have to make sacrifices, he prioritizes himself over everyone
else in his life. However, he shows potential to become a better person through
his ethics. For example, I appreciate his honesty when he criticizes his best
friend, Guitar, for joining a secret organization that kills innocent white people,
yet he remains friends with Guitar and keeps his secret (159). While I admire
Milkman’s loyalty to his friend, he seems to maintain the friendship mostly
because he enjoys having fun with Guitar and he prioritizes his selfish need for
excitement over his moral objections to his friend’s actions. As long as
Guitar’s violence does not affect him, Milkman appears fine with befriending a
murderer, highlighting his self-absorbed nature. Although I hardly condone
Guitar’s racist and violent actions, I admire how he risks his life and
sacrifices for a cause he believes in, while Milkman refuses to take act on his
convictions, lest he jeopardize his comfortable lifestyle. Morrison sums up
Milkman’s attitude as a “mood of lazy righteousness,” directly characterizing
him as “lazy” and juxtaposing Milkman’s indolent behavior and the hardworking attitude
of the rest of the male characters (120).
Morrison continues to juxtapose the two boys and their outlooks on life
and when Guitar and Milkman fantasize about some gold they plan to steal, she
highlights Milkman’s dreams of buying planes and cars for himself while Guitar
imagines buying nice things for his family (179). Throughout the novel, Milkman
concentrates solely on his own desires, even if it requires stepping on others to
ensure his happiness. In particular, he seems ungrateful for the women in his
life, causing his own sister to describe him as a “pitiful, stupid, selfish,
hateful man” for treating his mother and sisters as though they mattered less
than him (216). I could never befriend Milkman because I not only strongly
disagree with his sexist views, but I also believe friendship requires mutual
respect and he would look down on me because of my gender. The disgust his
siblings show for him and he shows for his best friend implies that he does not
value creating strong, lasting relationships with anyone and would turn on his
friends in an instant, leaving him someone who will never experience a true
friendship unless he drastically changes.
Looking Beyond the Surface
In Toni
Morrison’s 1977 novel, Song of Solomon, the author’s style of
withholding information from the reader fascinates me as it forces the reader
to connect with the characters and experience their emotions as they do. In the
beginning of the novel, Morrison describes how Macon Dead abuses his wife and “kept…his
family awkward with fear,” using judgmental diction “awkward” to create a
critical tone and indirectly characterize him as cruel (10). The writer then demonstrates
Macon’s harsh attitude towards the rest of the town through describing a
situation when Macon, an owner of several houses, refuses to help a tenant who
has fallen behind on her rent and forces her and her young grandson out of the
house and onto the
street (21). Morrison uses the anecdote to highlight Macon’s selfish nature in
order to create an initial bias against Macon so readers understand why the
town dislikes him. In particular, Milkman’s best friend, Guitar, loathes Macon more
than others do and as the novel progresses, Morrison reveals that Macon evicted
Guitar and his grandmother. As I suddenly realized the earlier anecdote’s significance
in creating Guitar’s deep-seated hatred, I sympathized with him because Macon’s
actions also enraged me before I learned of his own problems. While the writer
initially portrays Macon as the antagonist, she slowly exposes his difficult
past that includes his murdered father, his wife’s possibly incestuous
relationship with her father, and his wife’s manipulation of him. Macon’s wife relentlessly
tries to cause him to lose control and become violent, because she enjoys bringing
“her husband to a point…of helplessness” (64). In one sentence, Morrison portrays
an abusive husband as a victim, through revealing information about his difficult
home life and other characters’ hatred for him. Although Morrison’s writing
style sometimes frustrates me with its changing portrayals of characters, it
forces me to continually reevaluate the book, as even the smallest details
became meaningful as the novel progresses and can completely change how I view
characters. The author’s writing style forces people who judge others quickly to
keep themselves open to new viewpoints and reassess their opinions of others.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)