In Toni
Morrison’s 1977 novel, Song of Solomon, the author’s style of
withholding information from the reader fascinates me as it forces the reader
to connect with the characters and experience their emotions as they do. In the
beginning of the novel, Morrison describes how Macon Dead abuses his wife and “kept…his
family awkward with fear,” using judgmental diction “awkward” to create a
critical tone and indirectly characterize him as cruel (10). The writer then demonstrates
Macon’s harsh attitude towards the rest of the town through describing a
situation when Macon, an owner of several houses, refuses to help a tenant who
has fallen behind on her rent and forces her and her young grandson out of the
house and onto the
street (21). Morrison uses the anecdote to highlight Macon’s selfish nature in
order to create an initial bias against Macon so readers understand why the
town dislikes him. In particular, Milkman’s best friend, Guitar, loathes Macon more
than others do and as the novel progresses, Morrison reveals that Macon evicted
Guitar and his grandmother. As I suddenly realized the earlier anecdote’s significance
in creating Guitar’s deep-seated hatred, I sympathized with him because Macon’s
actions also enraged me before I learned of his own problems. While the writer
initially portrays Macon as the antagonist, she slowly exposes his difficult
past that includes his murdered father, his wife’s possibly incestuous
relationship with her father, and his wife’s manipulation of him. Macon’s wife relentlessly
tries to cause him to lose control and become violent, because she enjoys bringing
“her husband to a point…of helplessness” (64). In one sentence, Morrison portrays
an abusive husband as a victim, through revealing information about his difficult
home life and other characters’ hatred for him. Although Morrison’s writing
style sometimes frustrates me with its changing portrayals of characters, it
forces me to continually reevaluate the book, as even the smallest details
became meaningful as the novel progresses and can completely change how I view
characters. The author’s writing style forces people who judge others quickly to
keep themselves open to new viewpoints and reassess their opinions of others.
I also believe that this book forced me to keep an open mind about the characters. Although I found it difficult sometimes to continue reading about such flawed and often hateful people, the book taught me to have more compassion for others, as I do not always know about their pasts. For example, I judged Ruth in the beginning of the book for her spineless and weak actions, but soon began to feel sympathy for her when Morrison uncovered information about her loveless marriage and difficult childhood.
ReplyDeleteThis reminds me of Perry Smith of In Cold Blood. The idea that one initially greatly dislikes a character and then realizes their troubled past appeals to my taste in novels. I find that this type of writing parallels real-life situations much more realistically through the development of dynamic characters. It seems that in reality most criminals have had troubled upbringings and act in reaction to their own difficulties.
ReplyDelete